Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Nati...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd

High Court 07 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd
Date of order
07 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
1998-1999
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2442 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax-1...Appellant.v.National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd..Respondent. Mr. C. Chanderpal for the Appellant. Mr. Ajit Shah with S.M. Iyer for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 7th March, 2013 PC: In this appeal by the revenue for assessment year 1998-1999 following questions of law have been raised for our consideration. a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in allowing expenditure on consultancy and advisory fees amounting to Rs.3,65,51,614/- for restructuring of business operations as revenue expenditure being payment made to parties during the year for restructuring of business operations even though such expenditure was clearly capital in nature? b)Whether on the facts of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in allowing expenditure on consultancy and advisory fees amounting to Rs.1,50,000/- paid to various persons during the year for modernization of project as deduction even though such expenditure was clearly capital in nature? 2)The Counsel for the parties state that an identical issue was raised by the revenue in respect of the same respondent assessee in Income Tax Appeal No.1762 of 2011 and this Court by an order dated 11/2/2013 refused to entertain the revenue's appeal. For the reasons stated in our order dated 11/2/2012 in Income Tax Appeal No.1762 of 2011, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan