Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Authomotive Manufacturers Limited

High Court 21 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Authomotive Manufacturers Limited
Date of order
21 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Authomotive Manufacturers Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1486/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.496 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 2, MumbaiVersusAndhra Valley Power Supply Co. Limited ..Appellant...Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Ajit Shah with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2136/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO .1119 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai ..Appellant...Respondent. Versus Authomotive Manufacturers Limited Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2331/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3680 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, MumbaiVersus ..Appellant. Litolier Properties Private Limited ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant. Mr.P.R. Toprani for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2332/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3767 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 5, MumbaiVersusJindal Iron & Steel Co. Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant.None for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2454/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO724 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, MumbaiVersusPankaj Piyush Trade & Investment Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.B.V. Jhaveri with Ms.Priti Shukla for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2455/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2252 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2456/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2247 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2457/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2622 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2458/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2590 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2456/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2274 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 7, MumbaiVersusTata International Limited ..Appellant...Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Ajit Shah with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2508/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.7 of 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, KolhapurVersusThe Sangli Bank Limited ..Appellant...Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2542/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1252 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax, City VI, MumbaiVersusLloyds Steel Industries Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.J.S. Saluja for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2544/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1042 OF 2008ANDNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2543/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1044 OF 2008 Director of Income Tax (International Taxation), MumbaiVersusSumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation ..Appellant...Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1942/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1694 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusGannon Dunkerley & Co. Limited..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Rajesh Patil i/by Mahesh Jani & Co. for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2520/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2300 OF 2008AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2346/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2305 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 8, MumbaiVersus ..Appellant. Black & Veatch Private Limited..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent. AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2502/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2302 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Hoechst India Limited, Mumbai..Respondent. ..Appellant. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009. P.C. : Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Rajesh Patil i/by Mahesh Jani & Co. for the respondent. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2520/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2300 OF 2008AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2346/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2305 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 8, MumbaiVersus ..Appellant. Black & Veatch Private Limited..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent. AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2502/2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2302 OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax - 8, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusM/s.Hoechst India Limited, Mumbai..Respondent. ..Appellant. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1.Though there is delay in filing the appeals, no sufficient cause is shown. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of ChaudharanaSteels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705(S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of MotionNo.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 of 2008) decided on 8/7/2009, that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.In this view of the matter, all the notices of motion are dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs. 3.In view of dismissal of notices of motions, appeals does not survive. Hence, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan