The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Aventis Cropscience Limited
High Court
16 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Aventis Cropscience Limited
Date of order
16 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Aventis Cropscience Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.In the result, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4546 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Aventis Cropscience Limited
..Respondent.
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Mr.Madhur Agarwal i/by Mint & Conferes for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 16th November 2011
1.Although two questions of law are raised by the Revenue in this appeal, counsel for the parties state that the second question does not arise out of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2.In so far as the first question is concerned, counsel for the parties state that similar question has been answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Acrow India Limited reported in (2010) 298 ITR 447 (Bom). In this view of the matter, first question cannot be entertained.
3.In the result, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue