The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Godrej Appliances Limited
High Court
29 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Godrej Appliances Limited
Date of order
29 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Godrej Appliances Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.899 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Godrej Appliances Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Jitendra Jain i/by Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 29TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.Both parties agree that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s.Rotork Controls India (P) Limited V/s. C.I.T., Chennai reported in 314ITR 62 (S.C.).
2.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue