Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Indian Seamless Metal Tube Limited

High Court 02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Indian Seamless Metal Tube Limited
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. Indian Seamless Metal Tube Limited, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.The appeal is thus disposed of with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.71 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, MumbaiVersusIndian Seamless Metal Tube Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.A.K. Jasani i/by S.N. Inamdar for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2[nd] July, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for rival parties. Both parties agree that the tribunal has relied upon the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Virtual Soft Systems Limited V/s. CIT [2007] 289 ITR 83 (SC). The said Judgment has now been over-ruled by the Judgment in the case of C.I.T.V/s. Gold Coin Health Food P. Limited, [2008] 304 ITR 308 (SC). 2.In this view of the matter, the impugned order is quashed and set aside. Appeal is restored to the file of the tribunal for fresh hearing and decision in the light of the Apex Court judgment holding the field. 3.The appeal is thus disposed of with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan