Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.aarti Industries Limited

High Court 25 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.aarti Industries Limited
Date of order
25 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2003-04, 2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.aarti Industries Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.281 OF 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Aarti Industries Limited..Respondent. Mr.Tejveer Singh for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 25[th] March 2013 P.C. : 1.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2003-04, following question of law has been proposed for our consideration. “Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that expenditure incurred on computer software on account of SAP accounting package is allowable as business expenditure ?” 2.Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the issue arising herein is covered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue by order of this Court dated 24[th] January 2013 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1285 of 2012 filed by the Revenue in respect of the same respondent – assessee for assessment year 2002-03. For the reasons mentioned in our order dated 24[th ]January 2013 in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.1285 of 2012, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan