In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai v. M/S.aventis Cropscience Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4933 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 10, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Aventis Cropscience Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar with Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Mr.Madhur Agarwal i/by Mint & Confereres for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. DATE : 20[th] July, 2011.
1.This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Tribunal dated 21st January 2009. Perusal of the order of the Tribunal shows that the Tribunal has restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer in the light of the Judgment of the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT V/s. Mahavir Alluminium Limited reported in (2008) 297 ITR 77 (Del.). Since the Tribunal has restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh decision, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue