In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.godrej Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Review Petition and the Notice of Motion are accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.73 OF 2010
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1959 OF 2010
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.314 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Godrej Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited..Respondent.
None for the appellant.Ms.Khushbu Jasani with Mr.P C Tripathi for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 31[st] March 2012
1.None appeared for the appellant, when the matter is called out.
The Review Petition and the Notice of Motion are accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue