In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.manoj Housing Finance Co. Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1664 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Manoj Housing Finance Co. Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.P. Jain i/by Mr.Prakash Panjabi for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 28[th] February, 2011.
1.The learned Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that similar questions raised in the assessee’s own case being Income Tax Appeal No.2272 of 2009 have been rejected by this Court today. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed. No costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue