Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.synchem Chemicals (India) Private Limited

High Court 16 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.synchem Chemicals (India) Private Limited
Date of order
16 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai v. M/S.synchem Chemicals (India) Private Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATE : 16th November 2011 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6811 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 10, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Synchem Chemicals (India) Private Limited..Respondent. Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the appellant.Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 16th November 2011 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in para-9 of its order has recorded a finding of fact that the assessee has voluntarily submitted revised computation of the valuation without being provoked by the query raised by the assessing officer during the course of assessment proceedings. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that there was bona fide mistake in valuing the stock and the same has been rectified by filing revised computation. In this view of the matter, the Tribunal has held that this is not the fit case to levy penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3.Since the decision of the Tribunal is based on finding of fact, we see no merit in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.R. Joshi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan