In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal accordingly stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.132 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax-10....AppellantMumbai
Vs.
Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd.....RespondentMumbai
Mr. Arvind Pinto, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Jitendra Jain a/w Mr. Sameer Dalal i/by PDS Legal for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 9 JUNE, 2017
PER COURT :
The issue in the present matter has become academic. The Appellant has approached this Court on the ground that the Tribunal was not justified in granting further stay of demand beyond the period of 365 days in contravention of the provisions of Section 254 2(A) of the Income Tax Act.
Dusane
2/2
2The learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the substantive appeal now itself has been decided by the Tribunal.
3In view of the above, no purpose would be served. The Appellant can agitate the ground raised in the appeal in appropriate proceeding. The appeal accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.
( G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.