Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -10 v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -10 v. M/S. Aarti Industries Ltd

High Court 11 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -10 v. M/S. Aarti Industries Ltd
Date of order
11 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -10 v. M/S. Aarti Industries Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

nms3485.10.sxw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3485 OF 2010 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1367 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax -10 Vs. M/s. Aarti Industries Ltd. ..Appellant .. Respondent Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 11TH APRIL, 2011. P.C. 1.Heard. 2.None for the respondent, though served. 3For the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of notice of motion, the motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan