The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.tata Telecom Ltd. (Now Avaya Global Connect Ltd
High Court
16 Jun 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.tata Telecom Ltd. (Now Avaya Global Connect Ltd
Date of order
16 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.tata Telecom Ltd. (Now Avaya Global Connect Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the statement made on behalf of the Revenue by Counsel, the appeal would not give rise to any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3130 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-10.
Vs.
M/s.Tata Telecom Ltd. (Now Avaya Global Connect Ltd.)
....
Ms.Suchitra Kamble for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
...Appellant.
...Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
June 16, 2010.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that in view of the decision of this Court in CIT vs. Star Chemicals Pvt.Ltd., (2008) 11 DTR (Bom) 311 as well as the later decision of the Supreme Court in T.R.F.Ltd. v/s.C.I.T., (2010) 323 ITR 397 (S.C.), the issue raised in the appeal would be covered against the Revenue. In view of the statement made on behalf of the Revenue by Counsel, the appeal would not give rise to any substantial
question of law and is accordingly dismissed.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue