The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.victory Flast Co.pvt.ltd
High Court
18 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.victory Flast Co.pvt.ltd
Date of order
18 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.victory Flast Co.pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4156 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-10 )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Victory Flast Co.Pvt.Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 18.12.2007.
PC
1. The averments in the affidavit have not been
contested, delay condoned. Motion made absolute in
terms of prayer clause-(a). Office to register the
appeal.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
: 2 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-10 )..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Victory Flast Co.Pvt.Ltd., )..Respondents
----
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite,JJ
R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 18.12.2007.
1. Appeal has been filed on the following question
of law :-
"Whether in facts and in circumstances of
: 3 :
the case and in law, the learned CIT(A)
has ignored the fact that the Gujrat bench
of the learned ITAT in the case of Gujrat
Akali Chemicals reported in 77 ITJ 304
(Ahd) which has held after considering the
decision of Sudershan Chemicals that
turnover should include all ingredients of
sales tax and excise duty ?
Commissioner of Income Tax
2. The Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax
v.Lakshmi Machine Works reported in 290 ITR 667 (SC)
v.Lakshmi Machine Works
v.Lakshmi Machine Works
has answered the issue in favour of the assessee.
In the light of that, learned Counsel seeks
withdrawal of the appeal. Appeal dismissed as
withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per rules.
Certified copy expedited.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.