Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.victory Flast Co.pvt.ltd

High Court 18 Dec 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.victory Flast Co.pvt.ltd
Date of order
18 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-10 v. M/S.victory Flast Co.pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4156 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-10 )..Appellant Versus M/s.Victory Flast Co.Pvt.Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.12.2007. PC 1. The averments in the affidavit have not been contested, delay condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause-(a). Office to register the appeal. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) : 2 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2202 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income Tax-10 )..Appellant Versus M/s.Victory Flast Co.Pvt.Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. None for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.12.2007. 1. Appeal has been filed on the following question of law :- "Whether in facts and in circumstances of : 3 : the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) has ignored the fact that the Gujrat bench of the learned ITAT in the case of Gujrat Akali Chemicals reported in 77 ITJ 304 (Ahd) which has held after considering the decision of Sudershan Chemicals that turnover should include all ingredients of sales tax and excise duty ? Commissioner of Income Tax 2. The Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v.Lakshmi Machine Works reported in 290 ITR 667 (SC) v.Lakshmi Machine Works v.Lakshmi Machine Works has answered the issue in favour of the assessee. In the light of that, learned Counsel seeks withdrawal of the appeal. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan