Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 11, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai v. Date

High Court 19 Oct 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai v. Date
Date of order
19 Oct 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai v. Date, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6878 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 11, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus P.C. Hansotia and Company ..Respondent. Ms.S.V. Bharucha for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 19[th] October 2011 1.Counsel for the parties state that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered against the Revenue by the decisions of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. A.F. Ferguson & Company, being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.87 of 2011 decided on 21[st] July 2011 and Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. M/s.C.C. Chokshi & Company, being Income Tax Appeal No.209 of 2008 decided on 25[th] July 2008. 2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs. (K.K. Tated, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan