The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 11, Mumbai v. M/S.c.c. Chokshi & Co., Mumbai
High Court
25 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 11, Mumbai v. M/S.c.c. Chokshi & Co., Mumbai
Date of order
25 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 11, Mumbai v. M/S.c.c. Chokshi & Co., Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.86 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 11, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.C.C. Chokshi & Co., Mumbai
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Ms.S.V. Bharucha for the appellant.Mr.Yogini Chauhan i/by Vigil Juris for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 25[th] July, 2011.
1.Although four questions of law are raised by the Revenue in this Appeal, counsel for the Revenue states that she is not pressing questions B,C and D.
2.As regards question A is concerned, counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the said question is answered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie, Blunt & Caroe reported in (1991) 190 ITR 198 (Bom).
3.In this view of the matter, the first question cannot be entertained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue