The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S.c.c.chokshi & Co
High Court
25 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S.c.c.chokshi & Co
Date of order
25 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S.c.c.chokshi & Co, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.209 OF 2008
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.193 OF 2008
The Commissioner of income Tax-11...Appellant
vs.
M/s.C.C.Chokshi & Co....Respondent.
---
Mr.Vimal Gupta, for Appellant.Mr.Parag Pardiwala i/b. Vigil Juris, for Respondent.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 25[th] July, 2008.
P.C.:-
1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for boththe sides. Perused the record. In view of thejudgment of the Division bench of this Court in thecase “Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mulla and Mullaand Craigie, Blunt and Caroe, 1991 ITR 198”, in ouropinion, no exception can be taken to the order
passed by the Tribunal. Hence, the appeals aredisposed of.
---
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue