The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. Rajshri Productions Pvt.ltd.mumbai
High Court
03 Jun 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. Rajshri Productions Pvt.ltd.mumbai
Date of order
03 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. Rajshri Productions Pvt.ltd.mumbai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.597 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.597 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.597 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
6 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1004 OF 200
6 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1004 OF 200
6 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1004 OF 200
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.484 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.484 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.484 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-11 .. Appellant
Vs.
Rajshri Productions Pvt.Ltd.Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.DATE : 3rd June, 2008
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd June, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. It
appears that the Appellant-revenue had taken out the
Notice of Motion No.1004 of 2006 for condonation of 429
days delay caused in filing the Appeal, and this Court
by an order dated 1st October, 2007 has dismissed the
aforesaid Notice of Motion No.1004/2006. On the very
same day since the Notice of Motion was dismissed and
the delay was not condoned, the Appeal was also
dismissed and the refund of Court fees was also granted
as per the Rules.
2. Strangely the Appellant has taken out the present
Notice of Motion No.597/2008 seeking recall of the
purported order dated 18.9.2007 which was passed in the
Income Tax Apeal (L) No.484/2006 & the Notice of Motion
No.1004/2006. It appears that though the Appellant has
( 2 )
rightly described the Appeal Number in the title as
Appeal (L) No.484/2006 and has rightly described the
names of the parties, in the prayer clause the date of
the purported order is wrong.
3. When the Appeal & the Notice of Motion No.1004/2006
for condonation of delay were dismissed by this Court
earlier, we do not understand as to why the present
Notice of Motion is taken out by the Appellant. The
Notice of Motion No.597/2008 is unsustainable and hence
the same stands dismissed with costs quantified at
Rs.5000/- which shall be paid by the Appellant within a
period of two weeks from today.
(A.P.BHANGALE J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(A.P.BHANGALE J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.