Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. Shr...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. Shri Pramod H. Lele

High Court 28 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. Shri Pramod H. Lele
Date of order
28 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11 v. Shri Pramod H. Lele, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1754 OF 2014 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-11Versus … Appellant Shri Pramod H. Lele … Respondent ****** Mr. Prakash Chandra Chhotaray for the Appellant.Mr. Rajeev Waglay i/b DSR Legal for the Respondent. ****** CORAM: DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 28[th] JULY, 2022 P.C. :- 1. Learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the taxeffect in the present Appeal is below the limit stipulated interms of Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 8[th] August, 2019. It isstated that no instructions have been received from theDepartment to withdraw the present Appeal. 2.In the light of Circular No. 17 of 2019, the Appeal isdisposed of as involving low tax effect. 3. However, we observe that in case, the Revenue finds forsome reason that the Appeal was not supposed to have beenNikita Gadgil 1/2 Digitallysigned byNIKITANIKITAYOGESHYOGESHGADGILGADGILDate:2022.07.2817:58:57+0530 withdrawn in the light of the Circular, it would be open to theRevenue to file an application seeking restoration of the Appealto be decided on its own merits. Refund of Court-fees as perrules. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,J.) Nikita Gadgil 2/2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan