Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Late Shri D.l. Shah

High Court 08 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

08 Sep 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Late Shri D.l. Shah, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. : DATE : 8th September 2011 1.The appeal is already dismissed by order dated 17[th] April 2008.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION GIFT TAX APPEAL NO.3808 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai..Appellant. VersusLate Shri D.L. Shah..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 8th September 2011 1.The appeal is already dismissed by order dated 17[th] April 2008. Hence, this appeal is wrongly on board. Remove from board. (K.K. Tated, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.