In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. Mittal Court Premises Cooperative Society Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4138 OF 2010ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4139 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Mittal Court Premises Cooperative Society Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 12[th] July, 2011.
1.Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the questions raised in
this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in
the assessee's own case reported in 320 ITR 414 (Mittal Court Premises Cooperative Society Limited V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax).
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue