The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Mr.shree Bhagwan Agarwal, Mumbai
High Court
21 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Mr.shree Bhagwan Agarwal, Mumbai
Date of order
21 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Mr.shree Bhagwan Agarwal, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3158 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai..Appellant.VersusMr.Shree Bhagwan Agarwal, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Parag Vyas for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009.
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in B.K. Kotru V/s. Commissioner of Income-taxreported in [2006] 282 ITR 1.
2.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue