The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -12 Mumbai v. M/S B.k.family Trust
High Court
02 Dec 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -12 Mumbai v. M/S B.k.family Trust
Date of order
02 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -12 Mumbai v. M/S B.k.family Trust, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 7012 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income-tax -12 Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
M/s B.K.Family Trust
... Respondent.
Mr P.S. Cardozo for the appellant.Mr V. Subramaniam with V.S. Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 2 December, 2011.
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of the CIT vs. Manjula J. Shah, being Income Tax Appeal No.3378 of 2010, decided on 11[th] October, 2011. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue