In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. M/S.ambika Enterprises, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1796 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Ambika Enterprises
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Sanjiv M. Shah for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. The impugned order deals with three assessment years. In respect of two assessment years, the appeals preferred against the very same order being Income Tax Appeal No.1187 of 2009 and Income Tax Appeal no.1190 of 2009 were already dismissed by this Court vide order dated 4-8-2009.
2.For the reasons recorded in that order, this appeal is also dismissed for want of substantial question of law. A copy of the order is retained on record. The appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue