Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Ms.anupa T. Tanna, Mumbai

High Court 08 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Ms.anupa T. Tanna, Mumbai
Date of order
08 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Ms.anupa T. Tanna, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2263 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Ms.Anupa T. Tanna, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the appellant.Mr.Niraj Sheth i/by Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 8[th] Ferbuary, 2010. P.C. : 1.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the issues in the Appeal are covered against the Revenue by the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Walfort Share andStock Brokers P.Ltd., [2009] 310 I.T.R. 421 (Bom). 2.In these circumstances, in view of the statement made, the Appeal does not give rise to any substantial question of law. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan