The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. M/S.drashti Impex, Mumbai – 400 001
High Court
06 Aug 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. M/S.drashti Impex, Mumbai – 400 001
Date of order
06 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. M/S.drashti Impex, Mumbai – 400 001, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2026 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1139 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Drashti Impex, Mumbai – 400 001
..Respondent.
Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.
Mr.Subhash Shetty for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 6 August 2010.
P.C. :
1.There is delay of 19 days in filing the appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Sufficient cause has been shown. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.The Notice of Motion is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue