Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Ms.mudera G. Nanawati, Mumbai

High Court 21 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Ms.mudera G. Nanawati, Mumbai
Date of order
21 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. Ms.mudera G. Nanawati, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3475 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Ms.Mudera G. Nanawati, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 21ST JULY, 2009. P.C. : 1.Heard. Both parties agree that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered against the revenue by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Wealth Tax V/s. HUF of H.H. Late J.M. Scindiareported in [2008] 300 ITR 193 (Bom). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan