The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. M/S.p.d. Kothari & Co., Mumbai
High Court
22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. M/S.p.d. Kothari & Co., Mumbai
Date of order
22 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12, Mumbai v. M/S.p.d. Kothari & Co., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1788 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.607 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 12, MumbaiVersusM/s.P.D. Kothari & Co., Mumbai
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the parties. For the reasons recorded in the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The notice of motion is made absolute accordingly.
2.Registry is directed to register the appeal. Office objections are waived. By consent of both the parties, Appeal is taken up for hearing.
3.On the motion made by the learned counsel for the revenue, he is allowed to withdraw the appeal since it is covered by the C.B.D.T. circular No.786 dated 7-2-2000. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in this behalf. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue