The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S.satyam Constructions, Mumbai
High Court
07 Mar 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S.satyam Constructions, Mumbai
Date of order
07 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 12, Mumbai v. M/S.satyam Constructions, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1529 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income TAx - 12, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Satyam Constructions, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.M. Subramaniam i/by Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 7[th] March, 2011.
1.Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the questions raised in
this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.1194 of 2010 {CIT V/s. Brahma Associates} decided on 22-02-2011. For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue