In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. Drashti Impex, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: In that view of the matter, it is not necessary to entertain these appeals which are accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.483 OF 2010WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.484 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12
Vs.Atlas Exports (India)
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.486 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12
..Appellant.
Vs.
Drashti Impex
..Respondent.
....
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
29 June 2010.
P.C. :
By the impugned judgment the Tribunal has remanded the
proceedings back to the Assessing Officer for recomputing the
deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Upon
remand, the Assessing Officer shall decide the issues before him in
accordance with law having due regard to the judgment of this Court
in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Kalpataru Colours and
Chemicals (ITA(L) 2887 of 2009) delivered today. In that view of
the matter, it is not necessary to entertain these appeals which are accordingly disposed of.
(Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.