The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S Bhakhtawar Commercial, Mumbai
High Court
30 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S Bhakhtawar Commercial, Mumbai
Date of order
30 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S Bhakhtawar Commercial, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3561 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-12....Appellant.Mumbai.
Vs.
M/s Bhakhtawar Commercial, Mumbai ....Respondent
Ms. Anamika Malhotra, Advocate for Appellant.None for respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDSMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2011.
P.C.
Counsel for the revenue states that the question raised in this appeal is covered against the revenue by the decision of this case in the case of C.I.T. vs. Mittal Court Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., reported in 184 Taxman (292). In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed.
( SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue