Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 … v. M...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 … v. M/S Malik Traders

High Court 05 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 … v. M/S Malik Traders
Date of order
05 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 … v. M/S Malik Traders, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In such circumstances, Appeal has no merits and is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

rng IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1215 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-12 … Appellant vsM/s Malik Traders ..Respondents ..... Mr.P.C.Chhotaray for AppellantMr.A.K.Jasani for Respondents ... CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND G.S.KULKARNI, JJ. DATE :- 05th March,2014 PC: 1.Heard learned counsel appearing for the Appellant. Perused the concurrent orders, one of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and that of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Both have concurrently found the reasons for rejection of the accounts and for exercising the power under section 145 (3) of the Income Tax Act,1961 are not in accordance with the settled principles. The Tribunal has in agreeing with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) found that initially the Stock Registers were not produced. Later on and during the course of the proceedings before the Assessing Officer, the Stock Register has been produced. There is some discrepency found and that is not of such a nature as would enable the Assessing Officer to reject the accounts. Reasons assigned in paras 7.1 and 7.2 of the order of the Income Tax Tribunal would show that on a limited ground on which the department has approached us namely there are substantial questions of law involved, has not been made out. This is an attempt to re-appreciate and re-apprise the materials produced, which is impermissible in law. 2. In such circumstances, Appeal has no merits and is dismissed. (G.S.KULKARNI J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan