Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S.mittal Court Premises Co-Op.society Ltd

High Court 06 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S.mittal Court Premises Co-Op.society Ltd
Date of order
06 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S.mittal Court Premises Co-Op.society Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeals accordingly stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3908 OF 2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.4019 & 4144 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-12. Vs. ...Appellant. M/s.Mittal Court Premises Co-op.Society Ltd. ...Respondent. .... Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.P.V. Bhujle for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. January 6, 2010. P.C. : Both Counsel for the Revenue and Counsel for the Respondent are agreed in stating that the questions raised in the appeals are covered against the Revenue by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Mittal Court Premises Co- operative Society Ltd., 184(2009) Taxman 292 (Bom). In view of the aforesaid statement, no substantial question of law arises in the appeals. The Appeals accordingly stand dismissed. ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan