The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 13, Mumbai v. Rajesh M. Khandhar
High Court
14 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 13, Mumbai v. Rajesh M. Khandhar
Date of order
14 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 13, Mumbai v. Rajesh M. Khandhar, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.538 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.225 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 13, Mumbai
Versus
Rajesh M. Khandhar
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Shivsharan for the appellant.Mr.K.C. Pandey for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 14 June, 2010.
P.C. :
1.There is a delay of 336 days on the part of the Revenue in filing
the appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained by furnishing a chronological account of the movement of the file. Sufficient cause has been shown. The Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue