Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax – 13 Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax – 13 Mumbai v. Shri Laxmichand Kunverji Kenia

High Court 02 Dec 2011 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 Dec 2011

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax – 13 Mumbai v. Shri Laxmichand Kunverji Kenia, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Ladda IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 177 of 2011. The Commissioner of Income-tax – 13 Mumbai ... Appellant. Versus Shri Laxmichand Kunverji Kenia ... Respondent. Mr Suresh Kumar, for the appellant.Mr Atul K. Jasani, for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 2 December, 2011. P.C. :- Counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v. Gopal Purohit reported in 228 CTR 582. S.L.P. filed by the Revenue against the said decision is also dismissed by the Apex Court on 15[th] November, 2010. In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.R.Joshi,J) (J.P.Devadhar,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.