Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Bip...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Bipin M.khandhar

High Court 11 Jun 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Jun 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Bipin M.khandhar, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: P.C. : The Motion is for setting aside a conditional order consequent upon which the appeal stands dismissed and for restoration of the appeal to file.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3067 OF 2009 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.218 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-13. ...Appellant Vs. Bipin M.Khandhar....Respondent. ..... Mr.A.S.Shivsharan for the Appellant.Mr.Bharat Gandhi i/b. Mr.K.C. Pandey for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. 11 June 2010. P.C. : The Motion is for setting aside a conditional order consequent upon which the appeal stands dismissed and for restoration of the appeal to file. Sufficient cause has been made out in the affidavit in support. No reply has been filed. The Motion is accordingly made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The appeal to be placed for admission on 14 June 2010. ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( J.P.Devadhar, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.