In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Dhiraj Devji Kenia, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.no order as to costs. [ A.A.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2259 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-13
.. Appellant
Vs
Dhiraj Devji Kenia
.. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE : 18th JULY, 2011.
1. Learned counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1121 OF 2009 in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1121 OF 2009
[The Commissioner of Income Tax - 25 Vs Gopal Purohit] decided on 6th January, 2010. Purohit] decided on 6th January, 2010.
2. In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.no order as to costs.
[ A.A. SAYED, J ]
[ J.P. DEVADHAR, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue