The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S Kanji Morarji
High Court
07 Mar 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S Kanji Morarji
Date of order
07 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S Kanji Morarji, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Appeal is devoid of merits and is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
rng
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1368 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-13
.. Appellant
vsM/s Kanji Morarji .. ..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for AppellantMr.A.K.Jesani for Respondent
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARIAND G.S.KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE :- 7th March,2014
P.C:
1. When this Appeal was called out for admission, Mr.Suresh Kumar appearing on behalf of the revenue fairly concedes that in so far as substantial question of law as framed by the Appellant in the memo of Appeal Question (a) is covered by our order passed on 5.3.2014 in Income Tax Appeal No.232 of 2011. For the reasons that are already indicated in that order this ground would not survive.
2. In so far as ground (b) is concerned, our attention is invited to the order of the Tribunal and particularly para 5 and 6 thereof. Since this ground was connected with Question (a) noted above, the tribunal consequent to the discussion regarding ground (a) held that the request of the assessee is allowed as miscellaneous expenses were incurred by
the assessee for its business purpose. This is a finding of fact and rendered in the light of the material placed on record. In view thereof, we do not think that any substantial questions of law arise for determination and consideration in this Appeal. The Appeal is devoid of merits and is dismissed.
(G.S.KULKARNI J.)
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.