The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 v. M/S.kanji Moorarji
High Court
15 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 v. M/S.kanji Moorarji
Date of order
15 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -13 v. M/S.kanji Moorarji, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of dismissal of the aforesaid Notices of Motion, the respective Income Tax Appeals also stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4882/2007 IN ITXA (L) 2763/2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4897/2007 IN ITXA (L) 2761/2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4898/2007 IN ITXA (L) 2762/2007
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4899/2007 IN ITXA (L) 2764/2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax -13 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Kanji Moorarji .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 15th April, 2008
DATE : 15th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
these Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 372 days’ delay caused in filing the
respective Appeals. Perused the affidavits-in-support
of the respective Notices of Motion. It appears that
though the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had granted
approval for filing the aforesaid Appeals on 17.11.2006,
the Appeals came to be filed belatedly on 30.11.2007.
We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given for
condonation of delay. The reasons given for delay that
of getting the draft memo of Appeal prepared,
administrative difficulties including non-availability
of Court fee stamps etc. does not appear to be
justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for
condonation of delay. Hence, all the aforesaid Notices
of Motion stand dismissed.
2. In view of dismissal of the aforesaid Notices of
Motion, the respective Income Tax Appeals also stand
dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.