In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S.venus Exports, the High Court decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
The Commissioner of income Tax-13...Appellant
vs.
M/s.Venus Exports....Respondent.
---
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee with Ms.Anamika Malhotra, forAppellant.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
P.C.:-
Heard the learned Counsel appearing forappellant. Perused the order of the Tribunal. Thetribunal has clearly recorded that the order of theCIT(A) is based on the finding of fact which was not
challenged by the appellant before the Tribunal. Noquestion of law arises. Hence, the appeal isrejected.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
---
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.