The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S.v.k.industrial Corporation
High Court
05 Apr 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S.v.k.industrial Corporation
Date of order
05 Apr 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. M/S.v.k.industrial Corporation, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the statement made on behalf of the Revenue, the present appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.188 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-13. Vs.
...Appellant.
M/s.V.K.Industrial Corporation.
...Respondent.
....
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
April 5, 2010.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue has stated before the Court that the issue which is sought to be espoused in this appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is covered against the Revenue by the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT vs. B.N. Exports (Income Tax Appeal 2714 of 2009, decided on 31[st] March 2010). In view of the statement made on behalf of the Revenue, the present appeal does not raise any substantial question of law and is accordingly dismissed.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue