The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Shri Devji Nenshi Palani
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Shri Devji Nenshi Palani
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Shri Devji Nenshi Palani, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.433 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.136 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-13..Appellant
Vs.
Shri Devji Nenshi Palani ..Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao for the appellant
None for the respondent
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATED : 17TH APRIL, 2008
P.C.:
1. None appears for the respondent though
served. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is
seeking condonation of 2 years 26 days’ delay
caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons
stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of
Motion, sufficient cause is made out for
2
condonation of delay, and there is no case of
inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the
part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion
is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. The learned counsel for the appellant
undertakes to serve copy of the Memo of Appeal on
the respondents. Place the Appeal on board for
admission in the month of July, 2008, subject to
numbering.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.