The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Sushma S. Daga
High Court
02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Sushma S. Daga
Date of order
02 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-13 v. Sushma S. Daga, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1379 OF 2014
The Commissioner of Income Tax-13Vs.Sushma S. Daga
…Appellant…Respondent
Mr. P. C. Chhotaray for Appellant.
Mr. Sudhir Mehta a/w. Mr. Kiran Mohite and Mr. Bhaskar Bhagat i/b.Ms Ishita B. Bhagat for Respondent.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN,MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.DATE :MARCH 02, 2020
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2.On the last occasion i.e., on 10.02.2020, learned standing counsel,Revenue sought for time to obtain instructions since the tax effect isbelow the prescribed limit in terms of CBDT Circular No.17 of 2019dated 08.08.2019.
3.Today, he submits that he has not received any instructions.
4.Be that as it may, since the disputed claim is Rs.22,94,493.00,evidently the appeal would be covered by the aforesaid CBDT Circular.The same is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
5.However, liberty is granted to the Revenue to seek revival of theappeal in the event it is found that the appeal falls within any of theexceptions provided under the said circular.
6.Court fee to be refunded as per rules.
(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)
(UJJAL BHUYAN, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.