The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. Daulatram B. Pehlajani
High Court
06 Dec 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. Daulatram B. Pehlajani
Date of order
06 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. Daulatram B. Pehlajani, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS ON 1595 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1158 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Daulatram B. Pehlajani
..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.Mr.Jitendra Jain i/by Mr.Ajay Mishra for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 6[th] December, 2010.
1.The Chamber Summons is taken out by the Revenue to bring the
legal heirs of the respondent on record. The learned counsel for the respondent has no objection. The Chamber Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.The Chamber Summons is disposed off accordingly.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue