The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai v. Dicitex Embroidery Exports
High Court
24 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai v. Dicitex Embroidery Exports
Date of order
24 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai v. Dicitex Embroidery Exports, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2299 OF 2010
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2300 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Dicitex Embroidery Exports
..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ.
DATE : 24[th] June, 2011.
P.C. :
1.In both these appeals, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the assessing officer for a fresh decision in the light of the Special Bench decision in the case of Topman Exports reported in 319 ITR 87. Since the Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the assessing officer, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. However, the decision of the Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of Topman Exports has been reversed by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals reported in 328 ITR 451.
2.In this view of the matter, the assessing officer is directed to take
into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colors
and Chemicals (supra) and pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
3.The appeals are accordingly disposed off with no order as to
costs.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.