In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.esskay Impex, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1212 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Esskay Impex
..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 6TH AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that similar questions raised in Income Tax Appeal No.1084 of 2009 has already been dismissed on 31[st] July 2009.
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue