Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mum...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.hindustan Essential Oil Company

High Court 22 Oct 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.hindustan Essential Oil Company
Date of order
22 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.hindustan Essential Oil Company, the High Court (2012) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: DATE : 22[nd] October 2012 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the activities of producing attar carried on by the assessee amounts to manufacture is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
agk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.299 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus M/s.Hindustan Essential Oil Company ..Respondent. Mr.Charanjeet Chanderpal for the appellant.Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.Jas Sanghavi i/by PDS Legal for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 22[nd] October 2012 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the activities of producing attar carried on by the assessee amounts to manufacture is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal following its decision in the assessee's own case for earlier years has allowed the claim of the assessee. The appeals filed by the Revenue in the assessee's own case for earlier years being Income Tax Appeal Nos.348 of 2011, 674 of 2011 and 812 of 2011 have already been dismissed on 13[th] January 2012. 3.In this view of the matter, we see no reason to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. No costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan