The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.j.m.c. Builders, Mumbai
High Court
28 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.j.m.c. Builders, Mumbai
Date of order
28 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.j.m.c. Builders, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2454 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.J.M.C. Builders, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.Mrs.Sanjukta Choudhury i/by PKP Legal Solutions for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 28[th] February, 2011.
1.The learned counsel for the Revenue states that the question of law raised in this appeal is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s.
Jamnadas M. Choksi Jewellers, Income Tax Appeal No.97 of 2007 decided on 28-07-2008.
2.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed. No costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue