The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.kamala Overseas
High Court
01 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.kamala Overseas
Date of order
01 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai v. M/S.kamala Overseas, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6939 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 14, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Kamala Overseas..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ. DATE : 1[st] July, 2011.
1.In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the assessing officer for a fresh decision in the light of the Special Bench decision in the case of Topman Exports V/s. ITR [(2009) 318 ITR (AT) 87 (Mumbai) (SB)]. Since the Tribunal has restored the issue to the file of the assessing officer, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. However, the decision of the Special Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of Topman Exports has been reversed by this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals reported in 328 ITR 451.
2.In this view of the matter, the assessing officer is directed to take
into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals (supra) and pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
3.The appeal is accordingly disposed off with no order as to costs.
(Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.