In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai v. M/S.krishnakumar & Co, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1351 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 14, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Krishnakumar & Co.
..Respondent.
Mr.D.K. Kamwal for the appellant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 12TH AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The tribunal has appreciated the documents available on record and after considering the terms and conditions thereof, has rightly held that the transaction was not in the nature of transfer of capital asset, since it was a development agreement. The finding of fact recorded in this behalf cannot be faulted. No substantial question of law can be said to be raised in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue